Follow Up 5- Constructive Criticism
Hey, I dunno If someone crossed out this stencil cause they thought it was “Wack Art Fag Shit” or because they thought it was CREAM’s, and they were beefing with him?
Either way, whatever. Still looks good.
I see a lot of beef directed to CREAM. Not sure why. Maybe cause the cool kids started beefing with him, and everyone else decided it was cool to cross him out too.
The second photo is of this big, sloppy piece I did more recently. I’m kinda pround of it, despite all the mistakes I made while doing it. I think that it is the largest thing I’ve ever done- A big, long, three-colour piece that incorporates a life-size stencil of a pixely geisha.
So thanks for the constructive criticism, (If you can’t read it, it says:”Stick to POSTERS, Yr Graff SUCKS”) but I’m fine with sloppy ugly graff… you know?
It certainly isn’t improved by your comments across her head.
Wait.
Maybe it is.
Yes?
… Yes.


(2 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)







February 2nd, 2009 at 2:51 pm
the question is -is bad graffiti better than no graffiti? is there some political efficacy to non-institutional non-consumer writing on the wall just inherent in the medium? Is graffiti progressive regardless of its quality/surface message/intent? or is graffiti only justifiable as grassroots urban beautification and protest against the corporate control over visual space? and therefore must adhere to some aesthetic standard?